Coping Effectiveness Training for Recently Diagnosed ALS Patients and Care Partners

After the diagnostic visit, patients (and accompanying family member) are commonly scheduled to return to the clinic or office in 3 to 6 months. At this first routine clinic visit, the focus is generally on assessment and management of mobility issues, diet, occupational adjustments, advance planning directives, insurance coverage and other pressing issues that usually take up the allotted time. Thus, there is often little opportunity to address the emotional impact of the diagnosis at that visit.

Our goal is a manualized intervention suitable for telephone or Skype delivery, for the management of distress and enhancement of coping skills among recently diagnosed ALS patients and/or their family care partner. We are adapting the intervention developed by Chesney, Folkman and colleagues, "Coping Effectiveness Training," as being the most salient and theoretically powerful design for our purpose. We base our work on Folkman's revised model that incorporates meaning-focused coping and the importance of positive emotions, in addition to the original model of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping. The course of ALS entails progressive losses, of mobility, fine and gross motor skills, speech, swallowing, and respiration. Each requires recalibrating emotional response and coping with new challenges. Early intervention to strengthen coping skills may equip patients and care partners to handle new challenges as they arise, although in this initial study we will not follow patients long enough to observe long-term effects, if present. Based on successful findings in this pilot study, the next step will be to conduct a larger RCT of the intervention.

Specific Aims and Hypotheses

AIM 1. To adapt and refine a manual for Coping Effectiveness Training for recently diagnosed ALS patients and their care partners (CET-ALS) based on Coping Effectiveness Training (CET). We will seek input from interviews with patients (whom we know from their participation in our ongoing studies), care partners and ALS clinic staff.

AIM 2. Feasibility and Acceptability: Evaluate acceptability, attrition, participant satisfaction and perceived barriers and facilitators to intervention delivery.